Premium-Seiten ohne Registrierung:

Auktionsarchiv: Los-Nr. 68

Tauba Auerbach

Schätzpreis
1.000.000 $ - 1.500.000 $
Zuschlagspreis:
n. a.
Auktionsarchiv: Los-Nr. 68

Tauba Auerbach

Schätzpreis
1.000.000 $ - 1.500.000 $
Zuschlagspreis:
n. a.
Beschreibung:

Tauba Auerbach Crease I 2009 acrylic paint, UV cured pigment on canvas 80 x 60 in. (203.2 x 152.4 cm) Signed, titled and dated "TAUBA AUERBACH 2009 CREASE I" along the overlap.
Provenance STANDARD (OSLO), Oslo Exhibited Oslo, STANDARD (OSLO), TAUBA AUERBACH / CAMILLA LÖW / EMILY WARDILL“ALMOST ALWAYS IS NEARLY ENOUGH,” February 12, 2009 - March 21, 2009 Literature B. Schwabsky, Vitamin P2, New Perspectives in Painting, London: Phaidon, 2002, no. 2, p. 35 (illustrated) T. Auerbach, Tauba Auerbach Chaos, Deitch Projects, New York, 2010, p. 10 (illustrated) Catalogue Essay “I probably think about higher spatial dimensions more than any other aspect of my practice. At the root of my interest is the question of what consciousness is: what it's made of and what its limitations might be.” TAUBA AUERBACH Although Tauba Auerbach’s work draws on a disparate range of sources, it retains an undeniable idiosyncrasy. In part this can be explained by the large measure of freedom which the artist allows herself. She reflects “to tell you the truth, I think much more about math than about art history. I don't have the sense that I am or that I want to be advancing a particular historical thread…my work is very much motivated by my own curiosities, rather than by a desire to engage with a certain discourse.” (Tauba Auerbach as quoted in Courtney Fiske, “Tauba Auerbach’s Peripheral Vision”, Art in America, June 21 2012) In Crease I, this individuality of purpose finds expression. Preoccupied with liminal space, the artist allows depth and flatness to coexist. Rows of dots give way to gentle undulations; space grows, flattens, and re-emerges. Auerbach embraces flux, creating a work of striking complexity. Tauba Auerbach is interested in what she terms “abstract binaries” (Tauba Auerbach “Interview by Aaron Rose”, ANP Quarterly, August 2008). Her work resists established dichotomies, and challenges ingrained patterns of thought. She works across a range of media, but common to her experiments in painting, sculpture and photography is a desire for conceptual overhaul. For her, aesthetic concerns are inextricable from theoretical ones. In her early career, Auerbach worked primarily with text. Both witty and conceptually informed, these works drew out language’s potential for ambiguity. Her 2007 work Subtraction (Splitting) is a striking articulation of this interest. Recalling the concrete poetry of Ian Hamilton Finlay the top line of the work reads “SPLITTING.” On each subsequent line, a letter is removed, forming a new word until at the bottom only “I” remains. The work plays with contiguity, suggesting that seemingly distinct entities may in fact be coextensive. In more recent years, Auerbach has moved away from text, but her work retains many of the same concerns. She traces a particular through-line: “towards the end of working with language in an explicit way, I became really interested in binary code as a linguistic structure. That catapulted me into thinking about binaries in general as logic-structures, and eventually I landed on the binary between flatness and not-flatness.” (Tauba Auerbach “Interview by Aaron Rose”, ANP Quarterly, August 2008) The present lot Crease I engages with this very binary. As the title indicates, the surface of the work appears creased; its ridges recall those of crumpled linen. One might suspect a reshaped canvas, given added depth by concealed struts. But this impression is an illusion. The canvas is flat; attending to the dots which run at a slight diagonal across the work, one recognises it as depthless. Yet this realisation does not lead to resolution. Ambiguity persists and the dimensionality of the piece remains fundamentally unstable. Just as “SPLITTING” slides into “I” and back, so three dimensions slide into two and back. The viewing experience is one of perpetual uncertainty; neither mind nor eye can settle. This uncertainty is a state which much of Auerbach’s work engenders. As the artist herself recognises, her work is able to “soften the distinction between 2D and 3D states of being.” (Tauba Auerbach as quoted in Courtney Fiske, “Tauba Auerbach’s Peripheral Visions”, A

Auktionsarchiv: Los-Nr. 68
Auktion:
Datum:
14.05.2015
Auktionshaus:
Phillips
New York
Beschreibung:

Tauba Auerbach Crease I 2009 acrylic paint, UV cured pigment on canvas 80 x 60 in. (203.2 x 152.4 cm) Signed, titled and dated "TAUBA AUERBACH 2009 CREASE I" along the overlap.
Provenance STANDARD (OSLO), Oslo Exhibited Oslo, STANDARD (OSLO), TAUBA AUERBACH / CAMILLA LÖW / EMILY WARDILL“ALMOST ALWAYS IS NEARLY ENOUGH,” February 12, 2009 - March 21, 2009 Literature B. Schwabsky, Vitamin P2, New Perspectives in Painting, London: Phaidon, 2002, no. 2, p. 35 (illustrated) T. Auerbach, Tauba Auerbach Chaos, Deitch Projects, New York, 2010, p. 10 (illustrated) Catalogue Essay “I probably think about higher spatial dimensions more than any other aspect of my practice. At the root of my interest is the question of what consciousness is: what it's made of and what its limitations might be.” TAUBA AUERBACH Although Tauba Auerbach’s work draws on a disparate range of sources, it retains an undeniable idiosyncrasy. In part this can be explained by the large measure of freedom which the artist allows herself. She reflects “to tell you the truth, I think much more about math than about art history. I don't have the sense that I am or that I want to be advancing a particular historical thread…my work is very much motivated by my own curiosities, rather than by a desire to engage with a certain discourse.” (Tauba Auerbach as quoted in Courtney Fiske, “Tauba Auerbach’s Peripheral Vision”, Art in America, June 21 2012) In Crease I, this individuality of purpose finds expression. Preoccupied with liminal space, the artist allows depth and flatness to coexist. Rows of dots give way to gentle undulations; space grows, flattens, and re-emerges. Auerbach embraces flux, creating a work of striking complexity. Tauba Auerbach is interested in what she terms “abstract binaries” (Tauba Auerbach “Interview by Aaron Rose”, ANP Quarterly, August 2008). Her work resists established dichotomies, and challenges ingrained patterns of thought. She works across a range of media, but common to her experiments in painting, sculpture and photography is a desire for conceptual overhaul. For her, aesthetic concerns are inextricable from theoretical ones. In her early career, Auerbach worked primarily with text. Both witty and conceptually informed, these works drew out language’s potential for ambiguity. Her 2007 work Subtraction (Splitting) is a striking articulation of this interest. Recalling the concrete poetry of Ian Hamilton Finlay the top line of the work reads “SPLITTING.” On each subsequent line, a letter is removed, forming a new word until at the bottom only “I” remains. The work plays with contiguity, suggesting that seemingly distinct entities may in fact be coextensive. In more recent years, Auerbach has moved away from text, but her work retains many of the same concerns. She traces a particular through-line: “towards the end of working with language in an explicit way, I became really interested in binary code as a linguistic structure. That catapulted me into thinking about binaries in general as logic-structures, and eventually I landed on the binary between flatness and not-flatness.” (Tauba Auerbach “Interview by Aaron Rose”, ANP Quarterly, August 2008) The present lot Crease I engages with this very binary. As the title indicates, the surface of the work appears creased; its ridges recall those of crumpled linen. One might suspect a reshaped canvas, given added depth by concealed struts. But this impression is an illusion. The canvas is flat; attending to the dots which run at a slight diagonal across the work, one recognises it as depthless. Yet this realisation does not lead to resolution. Ambiguity persists and the dimensionality of the piece remains fundamentally unstable. Just as “SPLITTING” slides into “I” and back, so three dimensions slide into two and back. The viewing experience is one of perpetual uncertainty; neither mind nor eye can settle. This uncertainty is a state which much of Auerbach’s work engenders. As the artist herself recognises, her work is able to “soften the distinction between 2D and 3D states of being.” (Tauba Auerbach as quoted in Courtney Fiske, “Tauba Auerbach’s Peripheral Visions”, A

Auktionsarchiv: Los-Nr. 68
Auktion:
Datum:
14.05.2015
Auktionshaus:
Phillips
New York
LotSearch ausprobieren

Testen Sie LotSearch und seine Premium-Features 7 Tage - ohne Kosten!

  • Auktionssuche und Bieten
  • Preisdatenbank und Analysen
  • Individuelle automatische Suchaufträge
Jetzt einen Suchauftrag anlegen!

Lassen Sie sich automatisch über neue Objekte in kommenden Auktionen benachrichtigen.

Suchauftrag anlegen