Premium-Seiten ohne Registrierung:

Auktionsarchiv: Los-Nr. 8

Christopher Wool

Contemporary Art
14.10.2006
Schätzpreis
80.000 £ - 120.000 £
ca. 150.012 $ - 225.018 $
Zuschlagspreis:
198.400 £
ca. 372.031 $
Auktionsarchiv: Los-Nr. 8

Christopher Wool

Contemporary Art
14.10.2006
Schätzpreis
80.000 £ - 120.000 £
ca. 150.012 $ - 225.018 $
Zuschlagspreis:
198.400 £
ca. 372.031 $
Beschreibung:

Christopher Wool Untitled (Riot) 1990 Alkyd on rice paper. 74 x 36 in. (188 x 93.05 cm). Stamped lower left “Wool”.
Provenance Luhring Augustine Gallery, New York; Jack Hanley Gallery, San Francisco Exhibited Paris, La maison rouge-Fondation Antoine de Galbert, Central Station: la collection Harald Falckenberg, October 22, 2004 – January 23, 2005, p. 12 (illustrated) Literature B. Brock and Z. Zdenek, Pump Haus : Sammlung Falckenberg, Hamburg, 2001, p. 134 (illustrated); L. Dreyfus and Maison rouge-Fondation Antoine de Galbert, Central Station: la collection Harald Falckenberg, Paris, 2004, p. 12 (illustrated) Catalogue Essay The world according to Christopher Wool is a place on the edge of disintegration, just as his sentences and sentence fragments are examples of no-nonsense words on the verge of turning into totally nonsensical syllables. (R. Storr, On the Edge, New York, 1997, p. 136). Whether it is through his early drip paintings, stamped image works, or his text paintings, Wool has continually been able to create work that engages some of the most important and pressing issues facing artists of the Twentieth Century. As a Contemporary artist he has pushed the boundaries of how to demonstrate the basic possibilities of visual expression; in particular the special and difficult to define qualities associated with painting. In his paintings Wool addresses the role of the ornament as signifier and decoration without taking a stand on this. “How much we depend on language to order experience is obvious from such exercises as deliberately disordering spelling syntax and implied utterance.” (ibid) “[Christopher Wool’s] interest in working with words was first manifested in concrete poems, as well as in titles for abstract paintings. Having seen a brand new, white truck with the words ‘SEX LUV’ hand-painted on the side, he started to work with compositions derived from stenciled words, the first a small drawing alternating the words ‘sex’ and ‘luv’ in a stacked composition. The first painting was a play on the words ‘trojan horse,’ dropping the ‘a’ in Trojan and the ‘e’ in the horse. These first so-called ‘word’ paintings focused on words or expressions with multiple meanings, particularly as they are broken up in composition, repeated, or modified or abbreviated through the deletion of letters: ‘helter helter’, and longer texts drawn from expressions originating in popular culture, such as Muhammad Ali’s proclamation ‘float like a butterfly, sting like a bee’,” (A. Goldstein, Christopher Wool Los Angeles/Zurich, 1998, p. 260). The linguistic gamesmanship Wool engages in has a long and complicated history. Its antecedents include the Dadaist practice of cutting texts up, letting the pieces fall onto a piece of paper, and then gluing them into place to create new texts. Such anticompositional techniques of the teens and 20’s were further developed by the lettrists of the 50’s and 60’s, who reduced the basic structures of language to a rubble of isolated sounds, and , performing them aloud, turned Dada’s babble into ear-grating squawks. In more recent history there have been the contributions of conceptual grammarians such as Lawrence Weiner and Joseph Kosuth and the haunting wordplays of Bruce Nauman with which Wool’s paintings share a marked verbal and emotional affinity. (R. Storr, ibid, p. 136) Wool considered his mature work to have started in 1984 when he began to focus and investigate the basic process of painting. Over the coming years his stylistic tastes changed and developed. By 1989 he was creating textual pieces that dealt with the abstraction of familiar phrases and words. In his text paintings Wool makes it possible to quite literally read the writing on the handwriting on the wall. The viewer is confronted with a work that can be experienced on multiple levels. On one level the words and phrases at the root of the work are familiar to the viewer but they must be discovered after deciphering a wonderfully complex all-over abstraction. Madeleine Grynsztejn elaborates on this by stating, “Christopher Wool’s “word” paintings “b

Auktionsarchiv: Los-Nr. 8
Auktion:
Datum:
14.10.2006
Auktionshaus:
Phillips
14 Oct 2006, 7pm London
Beschreibung:

Christopher Wool Untitled (Riot) 1990 Alkyd on rice paper. 74 x 36 in. (188 x 93.05 cm). Stamped lower left “Wool”.
Provenance Luhring Augustine Gallery, New York; Jack Hanley Gallery, San Francisco Exhibited Paris, La maison rouge-Fondation Antoine de Galbert, Central Station: la collection Harald Falckenberg, October 22, 2004 – January 23, 2005, p. 12 (illustrated) Literature B. Brock and Z. Zdenek, Pump Haus : Sammlung Falckenberg, Hamburg, 2001, p. 134 (illustrated); L. Dreyfus and Maison rouge-Fondation Antoine de Galbert, Central Station: la collection Harald Falckenberg, Paris, 2004, p. 12 (illustrated) Catalogue Essay The world according to Christopher Wool is a place on the edge of disintegration, just as his sentences and sentence fragments are examples of no-nonsense words on the verge of turning into totally nonsensical syllables. (R. Storr, On the Edge, New York, 1997, p. 136). Whether it is through his early drip paintings, stamped image works, or his text paintings, Wool has continually been able to create work that engages some of the most important and pressing issues facing artists of the Twentieth Century. As a Contemporary artist he has pushed the boundaries of how to demonstrate the basic possibilities of visual expression; in particular the special and difficult to define qualities associated with painting. In his paintings Wool addresses the role of the ornament as signifier and decoration without taking a stand on this. “How much we depend on language to order experience is obvious from such exercises as deliberately disordering spelling syntax and implied utterance.” (ibid) “[Christopher Wool’s] interest in working with words was first manifested in concrete poems, as well as in titles for abstract paintings. Having seen a brand new, white truck with the words ‘SEX LUV’ hand-painted on the side, he started to work with compositions derived from stenciled words, the first a small drawing alternating the words ‘sex’ and ‘luv’ in a stacked composition. The first painting was a play on the words ‘trojan horse,’ dropping the ‘a’ in Trojan and the ‘e’ in the horse. These first so-called ‘word’ paintings focused on words or expressions with multiple meanings, particularly as they are broken up in composition, repeated, or modified or abbreviated through the deletion of letters: ‘helter helter’, and longer texts drawn from expressions originating in popular culture, such as Muhammad Ali’s proclamation ‘float like a butterfly, sting like a bee’,” (A. Goldstein, Christopher Wool Los Angeles/Zurich, 1998, p. 260). The linguistic gamesmanship Wool engages in has a long and complicated history. Its antecedents include the Dadaist practice of cutting texts up, letting the pieces fall onto a piece of paper, and then gluing them into place to create new texts. Such anticompositional techniques of the teens and 20’s were further developed by the lettrists of the 50’s and 60’s, who reduced the basic structures of language to a rubble of isolated sounds, and , performing them aloud, turned Dada’s babble into ear-grating squawks. In more recent history there have been the contributions of conceptual grammarians such as Lawrence Weiner and Joseph Kosuth and the haunting wordplays of Bruce Nauman with which Wool’s paintings share a marked verbal and emotional affinity. (R. Storr, ibid, p. 136) Wool considered his mature work to have started in 1984 when he began to focus and investigate the basic process of painting. Over the coming years his stylistic tastes changed and developed. By 1989 he was creating textual pieces that dealt with the abstraction of familiar phrases and words. In his text paintings Wool makes it possible to quite literally read the writing on the handwriting on the wall. The viewer is confronted with a work that can be experienced on multiple levels. On one level the words and phrases at the root of the work are familiar to the viewer but they must be discovered after deciphering a wonderfully complex all-over abstraction. Madeleine Grynsztejn elaborates on this by stating, “Christopher Wool’s “word” paintings “b

Auktionsarchiv: Los-Nr. 8
Auktion:
Datum:
14.10.2006
Auktionshaus:
Phillips
14 Oct 2006, 7pm London
LotSearch ausprobieren

Testen Sie LotSearch und seine Premium-Features 7 Tage - ohne Kosten!

  • Auktionssuche und Bieten
  • Preisdatenbank und Analysen
  • Individuelle automatische Suchaufträge
Jetzt einen Suchauftrag anlegen!

Lassen Sie sich automatisch über neue Objekte in kommenden Auktionen benachrichtigen.

Suchauftrag anlegen