Premium-Seiten ohne Registrierung:

Auktionsarchiv: Los-Nr. 20

Ed Ruscha

Schätzpreis
150.000 £ - 250.000 £
ca. 256.065 $ - 426.775 $
Zuschlagspreis:
n. a.
Auktionsarchiv: Los-Nr. 20

Ed Ruscha

Schätzpreis
150.000 £ - 250.000 £
ca. 256.065 $ - 426.775 $
Zuschlagspreis:
n. a.
Beschreibung:

Ed Ruscha Reef 1975 blackberry jam and chalk on paper 35.9 x 57.8 cm (14 1/8 x 22 3/4 in.) Signed and dated on the reverse.
Provenance Acquired directly from the artist Sotheby's, New York, Contemporary Art Part II, 16 November, 1995, lot 363 Acquired from the above sale by the present owner Catalogue Essay Ed Ruscha’s work stems from his particular interest in typography and the concept of the word as art. His paintings frequently feature written words and logos, at times juxtaposed with background images. The present lot in question, entitled Reef and dated 1975, presents the heading itself as focus. The word ‘Reef’ is introduced in bold, white font against a pure and undecorated backdrop. The font takes up the central part of the upper third of the painting and highlights the emptiness of the remaining areas. The period in which this lot was executed involved a shift from the gestural abstraction involved in Abstract Expressionism to imagery that revolved around the newly overt commercial culture. Similar to other Pop artists, Ruscha drew inspiration from blurring the boundary between this popular culture and the arts. His bold, simplified aesthetic draws inspiration from the captivating visual language used in advertising and in particular to slogans employed in brand logos. Ruscha’s work is often compared with that of Andy Warhol and Roy Lichtenstein in its innovative approach and was featured together with their work in the 1962 exhibition at the Pasadena Art Museum ‘New Painting of Common Objects’. Whereas Abstract Expressionist art was largely unpremeditated, Ruscha highlighted the need for his work to “be planned and preconceived, or rather wondered about, before being done.” Ruscha’s interest in the premeditated highlights his shared qualities with the aforementioned artists: Ruscha states “I felt a kinship with Andy Warhol and Roy Lichtenstein because it was a logical departure from the kind of painting that was happening at the time.” (Artist Biography: Ed Ruscha www.acquavellagalleries.com). The integral role of text in Ruscha’s works is explained by his fascination with the vernacular: “I love the language. Words have temperatures to me. When they reach a certain point and become hot words, then they appeal to me.” (Artist biography: Ed Ruscha www.famouspopartists.wordpress. com 15 June, 2011). His interest in experimenting with words and phrases began in the early 1960’s. His choice of extracts is often centred on their comical and particularly satirical characteristics. The inspiration for his statements is spontaneous and unconscious: “Well, they just occur to me; sometimes people say them and I write down and then I paint them. Sometimes I use a dictionary.” The interchange between the use of a single, emphatic word and the presentation of an entire phrase can been seen to represent Ruscha’s transition into his involvement in the post Pop-Art movement, beginning it the 1980’s, where artists characteristically began to use entire phrases in their works. The emphatic use of the one word in this piece, however, applies to preceding period in his work: “Single words kept my interest for a while and then, later, there was only one thing to do – heap more words in.” This lot represents an integral period in the artist’s repertoire where he dissects language and fully explores the basis on which the rest of his oeuvre is based. Ruscha’s return to inception can be seen in the presentation of the single element but also further in the deconstruction of the word itself: “I always looked at a word like it was a horizontal bunch of abstract shapes, which is really what it is.” (J. Lindblad, Ed Ruscha Fify Years Of Painting, 2 September, 2010, www.artobserved. com). The explanation for his choice, therefore, becomes complicated to decipher. The agency of his paintings seems to lie in the adaptation of language from a means of communication to a symbolic object, almost attaining the qualities of a ready-made. The word ‘Reef’, powerful in its use of capital letters, enveloping consonants and repetition of vowels, results in the creation of an

Auktionsarchiv: Los-Nr. 20
Auktion:
Datum:
02.07.2014
Auktionshaus:
Phillips
London
Beschreibung:

Ed Ruscha Reef 1975 blackberry jam and chalk on paper 35.9 x 57.8 cm (14 1/8 x 22 3/4 in.) Signed and dated on the reverse.
Provenance Acquired directly from the artist Sotheby's, New York, Contemporary Art Part II, 16 November, 1995, lot 363 Acquired from the above sale by the present owner Catalogue Essay Ed Ruscha’s work stems from his particular interest in typography and the concept of the word as art. His paintings frequently feature written words and logos, at times juxtaposed with background images. The present lot in question, entitled Reef and dated 1975, presents the heading itself as focus. The word ‘Reef’ is introduced in bold, white font against a pure and undecorated backdrop. The font takes up the central part of the upper third of the painting and highlights the emptiness of the remaining areas. The period in which this lot was executed involved a shift from the gestural abstraction involved in Abstract Expressionism to imagery that revolved around the newly overt commercial culture. Similar to other Pop artists, Ruscha drew inspiration from blurring the boundary between this popular culture and the arts. His bold, simplified aesthetic draws inspiration from the captivating visual language used in advertising and in particular to slogans employed in brand logos. Ruscha’s work is often compared with that of Andy Warhol and Roy Lichtenstein in its innovative approach and was featured together with their work in the 1962 exhibition at the Pasadena Art Museum ‘New Painting of Common Objects’. Whereas Abstract Expressionist art was largely unpremeditated, Ruscha highlighted the need for his work to “be planned and preconceived, or rather wondered about, before being done.” Ruscha’s interest in the premeditated highlights his shared qualities with the aforementioned artists: Ruscha states “I felt a kinship with Andy Warhol and Roy Lichtenstein because it was a logical departure from the kind of painting that was happening at the time.” (Artist Biography: Ed Ruscha www.acquavellagalleries.com). The integral role of text in Ruscha’s works is explained by his fascination with the vernacular: “I love the language. Words have temperatures to me. When they reach a certain point and become hot words, then they appeal to me.” (Artist biography: Ed Ruscha www.famouspopartists.wordpress. com 15 June, 2011). His interest in experimenting with words and phrases began in the early 1960’s. His choice of extracts is often centred on their comical and particularly satirical characteristics. The inspiration for his statements is spontaneous and unconscious: “Well, they just occur to me; sometimes people say them and I write down and then I paint them. Sometimes I use a dictionary.” The interchange between the use of a single, emphatic word and the presentation of an entire phrase can been seen to represent Ruscha’s transition into his involvement in the post Pop-Art movement, beginning it the 1980’s, where artists characteristically began to use entire phrases in their works. The emphatic use of the one word in this piece, however, applies to preceding period in his work: “Single words kept my interest for a while and then, later, there was only one thing to do – heap more words in.” This lot represents an integral period in the artist’s repertoire where he dissects language and fully explores the basis on which the rest of his oeuvre is based. Ruscha’s return to inception can be seen in the presentation of the single element but also further in the deconstruction of the word itself: “I always looked at a word like it was a horizontal bunch of abstract shapes, which is really what it is.” (J. Lindblad, Ed Ruscha Fify Years Of Painting, 2 September, 2010, www.artobserved. com). The explanation for his choice, therefore, becomes complicated to decipher. The agency of his paintings seems to lie in the adaptation of language from a means of communication to a symbolic object, almost attaining the qualities of a ready-made. The word ‘Reef’, powerful in its use of capital letters, enveloping consonants and repetition of vowels, results in the creation of an

Auktionsarchiv: Los-Nr. 20
Auktion:
Datum:
02.07.2014
Auktionshaus:
Phillips
London
LotSearch ausprobieren

Testen Sie LotSearch und seine Premium-Features 7 Tage - ohne Kosten!

  • Auktionssuche und Bieten
  • Preisdatenbank und Analysen
  • Individuelle automatische Suchaufträge
Jetzt einen Suchauftrag anlegen!

Lassen Sie sich automatisch über neue Objekte in kommenden Auktionen benachrichtigen.

Suchauftrag anlegen